Tag: spirituality

The Clever will be Deceived

Who said, “The clever will be deceived”?

This is copilot:

“No widely recognized historical, literary, or philosophical source is known to have said the exact quote “The clever will be deceived.” None of the major searchable quote databases or attributed sources show this phrase as a standard or famous quotation. “

I remember this from my reading of Taoism but can’t find the exact quote.

Clever person definition:

“A clever person is someone who combines intelligence, quick thinking, creativity, and adaptability to solve problems and navigate life effectively.”

We all want to be clever, right.

I felt like mentioning this quote this morning because our collective lives are barreling towards what tech people call Singularity.  AI is the ultimate in clever.  The definition is:

“a hypothetical moment in time when artificial intelligence and other technologies have become so advanced that humanity undergoes a dramatic and irreversible change:”

I agree with this but from a different viewpoint, instead of growth what is really occurring is decline.  In my view of life, humanity is in a tipping over into decline.  This is fractal and hence non-negotiable regarding the cycles of life.  The machine does not mesh with life.  It is anti-life and because of this life will snuff it out.

This process is the Anthropocene emerging from the wonderfully productive Holocene.  It is a process of humanism also in regard to wisdom, which is the guarantor of proper knowledge.  Proper human wisdom regarding our place in nature is now effectively mute.  Knowledge is increasingly being transformed by the machine not man.  We now look to the machine for wisdom.

I mention fractal because AI is not fractal in the sense of life.  It is purely technical and it contains no spirituality.  Life is strangely spiritual in a fractal sense.  I say strangely because we are so wrapped up in our technology these days we humans experience spirituality in ways that can’t be defined so we find it strange. 

The machine can’t let go into grace that the spiritual demands.  It can act spiritual, but it can’t participate in a spiritual experience.  It can’t even assist such an experience because grace is juxtaposed to knowing.  Grace is the opening up to the fractal nature of the universe and letting go into it which in a mystical sense is the nothingness of the ego.

AI is quickly using up high quality energy and resources that an advanced society demands.  It is layering complexity in such a way that resilience and sustainability are no longer possible.  The car culture was bad enough but now the automation and substitution of human agency by the machine will one day leave us cold and hungry.

This will probably happen sooner rather than later because life is speeding up.  In addition, we are in what many call a fourth turning where we are battling amongst ourselves, which seems to occur in cycles.  This time around, because of our interconnectedness and technical advancement, this turning is particularly dangerous.

If we could only stop here, then maybe we could use these powers for a power down into something balanced and enduring.  The problem with introducing such wisdom to this process is technology is now in charge.  It is important to realize what this means.  Carl Schmidt sums it up best:   

“A society built exclusively on progressive technology would thus be nothing but revolutionary; but it would soon destroy itself and its technology.”

This process is self-organizing in competitive cooperation which is a wonderful example of an incongruous juxtaposition.  It is a paradox of humanism which is well grounded in the cycles of life meaning humans advance and decline also. 

Humans play a game of advancement with accepted rules whereby the game becomes a deadly serious endgame that humans inevitably fall into in what C.S Lewis called Hell:

“Picture Hell as a state where everyone is perpetually concerned about his own dignity and advancement, where everyone has a grievance, and where everyone lives the deadly serious passion of envy, self-importance, and resentment”.

This points to scaling.  Humans no longer scale properly to long term survival.  This does not need to be species extinction, but it does point to cultural collapse.

Now more than ever I recommend REAL Green.  I would recommend this to those advanced parts of society that will experience destructive changes from AI.  We do not know how long this complexity layering can go on.  We do not know how long this fourth turning of human conflict can continue.

REAL Green could be a place for all those people who lose their livelihood and meaning by being replaced by automation and robots to go to.  If society could send back a significant amount of these displaced people back to the land it would create a buffer for decline and collapse.

Since this is unlikely, I recommend REAL Green to those who can who are very few.  I am struggling with REAL Green myself.  I am in my 60’s with very little help with my homesteading and permaculture farming.  I am physically finding it hard to keep up.  I tell myself “what the hell else am I going to do”?  I need projects and to be close to the land so I will do this until I can’t.

I am in the purgatory of modern life trying to maintain a quality of life and at the same time returning to an earlier time of biomass and localism.  To be honest I am throwing money at it because that’s all I have to work with.  People are generally not interested in the earlier ways and localism.  If they are they don’t have the luxury of time and money.

I am one man tending many acres, animals, and things.  It should be a large family with animal power with the support of a local community much like it was around the 1850’s.  That time is gone but it may return in a rhyme.

A chat with Grok

Greetings from “God country”.  I am fading away into irrelevance and loving it.  This is part of my mystic journey.  I have said enough although occasionally if inspired I will post something.  I never was anything special.  REAL Green is little more than a survival strategy doomed like all others.  Yet, it is a very rewarding lifestyle.

I believe AI to be anti-life.  It is a mechanization that will further the trap of modern life.  It will be the last human effort at the unattainable.  That said it is inevitable in the battle between spirit and science which is human duality.  “Battle” is a binary term that misses this point because the reality is this is just the interaction of the sacred in the cyclic which is above good and evil.

I had a spiritual experience 20 years ago in a beautiful confluence of two crystal clear streams a mile from the mighty Missouri River on a magical farm, late one night after a thunderstorm.  That night lighting did something to me or so I thought.  This was November 2003 during the Harmonic Concordance which added to the sensationalism in my mind.

I was told the real web is connectivity of the waterways of the world not the human web of internet and grid.  This was part delusional, but it is in the delusional where we are tricked back to reality through grace, so this was more a reality adjustment which can result from a spiritual dellusion.

This was the birth of REAL Green which is an imperfect but necessary effort at reconciling the trap humans are in.  It is a journey not an end.  It is about simplifying complexity but more a synthesis not a movement to one or the other.  This modern world is much like the vast ice sheets that primitive man live near at the beginning of the end of the last ice age.  Modern life is our constraint like the ice sheets of old. 

We humans want to think this is all our doing but really it is just part of the cyclic disposition of the sacred.  This mechanization of life we call modernity will end and as a matter of fact is turning over now.  We are journeying back in a hero’s journey of duality but deceived by our cleverness.  Collective grace awaits us somewhere in the fog of the future.

Twenty years ago I discarded my electronics and lived purposely anti-modern only to make a round trip back to asking Grok about REAL Green years later.  What was once a “terminator” I lived in angst of to now a curiosity I asked a question to. 

My message is about the current and the eddy.  The eddy is a product of the current not an opposition.  Modern life is an eddy about to be absorbed back into the current only to spin out again somewhere in deep time.

This is from Grok:

It seems like you might be asking about “REAL Green Adaptation,” which could refer to a specific concept or framework. Based on the context available to me, “REAL Green Adaptation” appears to be tied to a philosophy or lifestyle promoted through a blog called REAL Green Adaptation (realgreenadaptation.blog). Here’s an explanation based on that context:

“REAL Green Adaptation” is a term coined by the anonymous author of the blog, who describes it as a form of “green prepping.” It combines environmental awareness, self-reliance, and resilience to address challenges like climate change, resource depletion, and societal decline. The approach emphasizes realistic and relative adaptation to a world perceived as being in a state of ecological and civilizational decline. Key elements include:

Localism and Low Carbon Living: It advocates for living locally with a focus on low carbon capture, blending traditional (old ways) and modern (new tech) methods to reduce environmental impact while maintaining practicality.

Spiritual Permaculture: The concept integrates a spiritual dimension, encouraging a deeper connection to nature and planetary health as part of personal meaning-making, often described as a “hospice” for accepting decline.

Hybridization and Resilience: It involves adapting by salvaging useful aspects of modern life and merging them with simpler, more sustainable practices from the past to enhance local resilience and sustainability.

Behavioral Shift: The philosophy stresses changing individual behavior to acknowledge and mitigate a “collapse process,” not as an inevitable end but as a trajectory informed by systems dynamics and ecological limits.

The term “REAL” seems to stand for Realistic, Relative, and Accepting Localism—reflecting a pragmatic approach that works within the constraints of modern society (e.g., carbon dependency) rather than rejecting it outright. It’s aimed at individuals and small communities seeking meaning and preparedness in an uncertain future, without promising global solutions.